User talk:Lilyu

Warning ! This user is essential for Wikimedia Commons to run properly.
Blocking this user may block the Toolserver, the Apache Servers and Wall Street !
Please refrain from blocking you nazi admin blocker addict !

Français : Bienvenue sur Commons, Lilyu!

Les premiers pas Le tutoriel des premiers pas et la FAQ peuvent énormément vous aider. Ils expliquent comment personnaliser votre interface (pour la langue par exemple), comment importer des fichiers, sans oublier les licences. Des compétences techniques ne sont pas indispensables. Soyez clair et présumez des bonnes intentions des autres. C'est un wiki - rien de très compliqué. Obtenir de l'aide Plus d'informations sont disponibles sur le portail communautaire. Vous pouvez posez des questions sur le service d'aide, le Bistro, ou encore sur IRC, au canal #wikimedia-commons. Vous pouvez également contacter un administrateur sur sa page de discussion.		Outils et astuces Indiquez par Babel les langues que vous maitrisez, ainsi que vos compétences infographiques Toutes vos importations de fichiers sont visibles sur votre galerie. Signez vos messages sur les discussions en tapant ~~~~ Utilisez CommonSense pour trouver les bonnes catégories pour vos fichiers. Pour créer un lien vers un fichier, tapez : [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], cela donne : Image:Foo.jpg Si vous importez des fichiers d'un autre projet (comme Wikipédia), utilisez l' outil prévu pour. Vous avez fait une erreur ? Voulez-vous renommer un fichier ? Importez simplement l'autre fichier et écrivez sur l'ancien : {{bad name|LE NOUVEAU NOM CORRECT}} Pour plus d'informations, lisez les règles de suppression
(P.S. Vous pouvez émettre une critique ou un commentaire sur ce message de bienvenue)

Arria Belli | parlami 00:38, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Test

• Commons:SVG Check
• File:Test.svg

[1] [2]

[3] [4]

Images de lilyu

russian : Incnis Mrsi (talk · contribs)

à faire : mettre tous mes texte de schéma en deja vu sans condensed  Done

Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle Commons:Project_scope/Evidence

---

[[Category:Images by Lilyu]]

[[Category:French Wikipedia humor]]

---

{{RetouchedPicture}}

{{copyvio|1=url}}

{{No penis}}

{{Vector version available}}

{{WTFPL}}

{{Keep}} {{Vd}} Help talk:Edit toolbar

{{Mdr}}

{{Lol}}

{{Smile}}

Category:Emoticon templates

{{no license|month=June|day=28|year=2011}} {{subst:nld}}

Commons:Top 200 Images that should use vector graphics by usage

Category:Écomusée de Saint-Nazaire --- Category:Problem tags {{Fact disputed}}

essai template

• /template
• /grr
• /test/layout/en
• /test/layout
• /test/en
• /test

YES!

I couldn't agree more. :D Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 12:11, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Mhm, I was poking around Special:NewImages and I came across it. I approve. :)

I am. :) I haven't seen you around in a while. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 13:31, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Sleep well! Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 13:48, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

RE Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Gyanendra drawing.JPG

I just wanted to let you know. You have two options, nominating an image for deletion (used if you are unsure if it should be deleted or not) or speedy delete (if you are sure it is a copyvio). In this case you speedied it and I (As the deleting admin) wasn't sure, so I converted it over the a DR. So, you did everything correctly. Thanks! --ShakataGaNai ^{^_^} 01:38, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Palinphotocropped2.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Palinphotocropped2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Appraiser (talk) 02:59, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Derivative version : Graphic editing of a commons' photo uploaded by someone else. The DR concern the original image.--Lilyu (talk) 02:20, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

2008 Election Suffrage Poll

Hello, Lilyu,

In the "No Change" section of the 2008 Suffrage Poll, it appears you cast a "support" vote that accidentally wound up in the column opposed to "No Change". Accordingly, I have moved your vote up into the section supporting "No Change". I apologize in advance if this is an error, please feel free to correct it. Thanks, Baileypalblue (talk) 08:15, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Champi-lilyu-en.png

Image deletion warning

Image:Champi-lilyu-en.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Sdrtirs (talk) 05:02, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

photo

hello. While I understand the point you are trying to convey, I do not think it is a copyright violation by any means. I am the owner of the image and it is an original photograph. --ChucksBike-O-Rama (talk) 00:55, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Yes.

There are three photos in that .gif, I animated this .gif but it´s ok if the .gif will be delated. --WikipedistaOcasional (talk) 03:28, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Yes I took the 3 photos by myself and I made the .gif. But, please remove it. I made a mistake. Sorry.

--189.129.155.154 04:19, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks Lilyu :)

--WikipedistaOcasional (talk) 15:10, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

NASA

Hi, my image is based on this one, which in turn is based on this, which comes from this page, which belongs to the NASA. I've changed some links so they point to said page, but I don't know if it's all right now, because all the images but the English version are bigger than the one in that page.--qwertyytrewqqwerty (talk) 19:17, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

hopla

Bonjour Lilyu,

Je me demandais, pourquoi as-tu enlevé ce passage de cette page ? Tu n'as pas laissé de commentaire de modification, donc je m'interrogeais... pure curiosité !

Merci, le Korrigan →bla 20:56, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Ouh la la non, je pourrais pas expliquer ça, tout ce que je connais en droit, je l'ai appris sur cette page :-) Merci pour l'explication ! le Korrigan →bla 22:26, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Pink octopus toy copie.png

You've uploaded a derivative work

We're sorry, but Image:Pink octopus toy copie.png has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Photographs of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this photo must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a derivative work, please explain why on the image description page.

ViperSnake151 (talk) 02:24, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Derivative version : Graphic editing of a commons' photo uploaded by someone else. The [Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Pink octopus toy.jpg DR] concern the original image.--Lilyu (talk) 02:20, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

have you ever read COM:DW?

Legally, most toys are art. It is the same thing whether you take a picture of a sculpture or a picture of Darth Vader. Both are copyrighted, in both cases, the copyright of the photograph does not void the original copyright, and in both cases you will need the permission of the original creator. You cannot upload pictures of a sculpture by Picasso, you can't upload photographs of Mickey Mouse or Pokemon figures. Numerous lawsuits have shown that Mickey Mouse or Asterix have to be treated as works of art, which means they are subject to copyright, while a common spoon or a table are not works of art. They can be copyrighted, perhaps, if they were given a very special form by a designer, but the ones you use at home are probably not.

— Commons:Derivative works

Objects with utilitarian functions that are not toys are not copyrightable though. But, amusement and entertainment in most cases does not count. ViperSnake151 (talk) 11:26, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Tigranes.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Tigranes.png. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:16, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Derivative version : Graphic editing of a commons' photo uploaded by someone else. The Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Pink octopus toy.jpg DR concern the original version of the image.--Lilyu (talk) 02:20, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Eloy Erentxun photograph

Hey! I don't know much about licenses, I only chose the one that thought was appropriate. The fact is that the photograph I uploaded is not under Copyright or any other type of license, as it is a personal photo of my family's: the person that is in it, the basque painter Eloy Erentxun, was my grandfather. So now, I don't really know what to do in order to keep the photograph from being removed... I would really appreciate your advice!

Image

It wasn't simply a pd-art image (as it was in the description), only a "pd-italy" that is not allowed here in commons (in it.wiki it is). So I deleted it :-) --Filnik^{\b[Rr]ock\b!?} 18:39, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

images maroc 1912

les images suivantes présentent un problème vis à vis du respect de la paternité de ces œuvres  :

• Image:Photos-General-Dalbiez-Boite-4-001.jpg
• Image:Photos-General-Dalbiez-Boite-4-002.jpg
• Image:Photos-General-Dalbiez-Boite-4-003.jpg
• Image:Photos-General-Dalbiez-Boite-4-004.jpg
• Image:Photos-General-Dalbiez-Boite-4-005.jpg
• Image:Photos-General-Dalbiez-Boite-4-006.jpg
• Image:Photos-General-Dalbiez-Boite-4-007.jpg
• Image:Photos-General-Dalbiez-Boite-4-008.jpg
• Image:Photos-General-Dalbiez-Boite-4-009.jpg

Ces images sont d'après vous datées de mai 1912, ce qui est compatible avec le sujet représenté : Le Gal Lyautey au Maroc. Vous en déclarez la paternité, ce qui signifie que vous avez plus de 96 ans, au minimum 110 pour que vous soyez en age d'utiliser un appareil photographique de l'époque.

Ceci est relativement peu vraisemblable. Pourriez vous indiquer qui en est le véritable auteur, svp ? Et s'il est mort, la date d son décès ? S'il s'agit de photos de famille, et que le décès de l'auteur est inférieur à 70 ans, en êtes vous l'unique héritier ?

Cordialement, Lilyu (talk) 14:58, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Bonsoir,

Ces photos sont des photos numériques prises à partir de quelques unes des 8 boites de photos stéréoscopiques sur verre en ma possession (plus d'une centaine de plaques, s'étalant sur plusieurs années), héritage de mon arrière grand-père, le Général Dalbiez, qui fut sous les ordres de Lyautey et en poste au Maroc au moment où celui ci fut nommé résident général. Mon arrière grand-père était alors général de brigade. Il participa aux campagnes du Maroc du 02/05/1911 au 31/03/1915. La date de mai 1912 est la date des événements et donc des plaques stéréoscopiques. La date des reproductions que j'en ai faites sont dans les Exif des photos. J'ai sélectionné les 9 photos où Lyautey est visible ou bien où mon arrière grand père et son état major l'attendent En résumé, j'ai la paternité et la propriété des reproductions numériques et la propriété des originaux.

Cordialement

Dominique DALBIEZ

Bonsoir, Ces photos me viennent de mon arrière grand-père (qui en était propriétaire, puisqu'en matière de mobilier, "possession vaut titre", ce qui s'applique à moi également), via mon père, et mon grand père. Je suppose que mon arrière grand père devait avoir demandé à un de ses subordonnés de prendre des photos pour lui, mais parmi les plaques en question, on trouve des photos prises alors qu'il n'était plus en activité, sans doute par son frère Auguste ou un ami. Je considère donc que mon arrière grand-père avait également la paternité et la propriété intellectuelle de ces photos. Le Comte Général Denis DALBIEZ est décédé à Nice, à l'hopital Pasteur, le 13 Août 1929.
Pour info, j'ai publié la totalité de ces photos stéréoscopiques sur verre sur mon site personnel de généalogie. Je vais donc indiquer D.Dalbiez (Denis Dalbiez)comme étant auteur de ces photos. Oh!! D.Dalbiez, c'est aussi moi, Dominique Dalbiez, ça c'est ballot! It's a joke! Je vais indiquer Denis Dalbiez. Quel type de licence dois-je indiquer? Cordialement. Dominique DALBIEZ

Bonjour :) En fait, il existe deux types de propriétés : Propriété matérielle : vous achetez un DVD d'un film, ce DVD et le film qu'il contient vous appartiennent, et vous pouvez revendre cet unique DVD. Propriété intellectuelle : vous ne pouvez pas faire des copies de ce film et les vendre/distribuer, parce que vous n'êtes pas propriétaire des droits du film, qui n'appartiennent qu'à l'auteur, puis à sa mort à ses descendants, pendant encore 70 ans. L'auteur est celui qui prend la photo, c'est lui qui possède les droits intellectuels sur ces images et leurs reproductions. Je conclut de notre discussion que vous ne possédez aucun contrat vous conférant des droits de republication/copie/modification. Vous ne pouvez pas, dans l'absolu, redistribuer ces images. Maintenant, dans le cas des publications anonymes, la loi française me semble indiquer qu'au delà de 70 ans à partir du 1er janvier suivant l'année de première publication, l'œuvre passe dans le domaine publique, et tout le monde est libre de l'utiliser/distribuer (pas sous licence GFDL ou creative commons, mais sous domaine publique). Ce cas de figure nécessite une recherche approfondie, il est préférable d'être apte à démontrer qu'une recherche approfondie pour identifier l'auteur c'est montrée infructueuse, avant de prendre le risque de publier une image domaine publique auteur anonyme. Car vous engagez votre responsabilité juridique en le faisant. Simple note accessoire, votre arrière grand père étant décédé depuis plus de 70 ans, toute œuvre intellectuelle qu'il aurait crée (ce qui n'est pas le cas de ces photos) est aujourd'hui dans le domaine publique. Dans le cas où nous nous trouverions avec une image dont l'auteur est anonyme et la publication plus vieille que 70 ans, il reste un dernier point à traiter : la numérisation de cette image. Ici, nous abordons une politique officielle de Wikimedia-Commons, qui est de considéré qu'il n'y a pas création de nouvelle propriété copyright lorsqu'il s'agit d'une reproduction fidèle d'une image dans le domaine publique : il s'agit d'une action mécanique qui ne présente pas suffisamment de créativité artistique pour être éligible à une protection copyright. Le bandeau à utiliser en ce cas est , et la page de Commons hébergeant l'image doit contenir une description de l'image (son contexte historique par exemple), une date de publication, et la mention auteur anonyme, en expliquant ce que nous avons discuté plus haut

Bonsoir Lily

Je note plusieurs inexactitudes ou approximations dans votre raisonnement, et un certain nombre d'informations dont vous ne tenez pas compte:

• Ces photos n'ont jamais été publiées, sauf par moi; il s'agit de photos personnelles du Général Dalbiez (voir plus bas)
• Vous faites référence à la loi française, mais il semble qu'il vous ait échappé que ces photos ne sont pas hébergées en France, mais aux Pays-Bas
• Vous ne tenez pas compte du fait que j'ai la propriété matérielle par possession des sources et intellectuelle par héritage en ligne directe

Elément supplémentaire: ces plaques de verre sont accompagnées de notes manuscrites de la main de mon arrière grand-père en décrivant le contenu, et accompagnent son journal personnel, également manuscrit.

En cas de chicane juridique, si celle-ci se déroulait en France, il serait impossible pour quiconque de démontrer une quelconque propriété intellectuelle pour ces photos de famille, en dehors de moi-même.

Quel est le bandeau à utiliser pour une oeuvre tombée dans le domaine public en France et publiée aux Pays-Bas? Je suppose que c'est celui que vous m'avez indiqué?

Merci de cette intéressante discussion, bien qu'elle me semble très académique dans ce cas précis, et de votre aide.

Cordialement

Dominique DALBIEZ

Bonjour, ça commence à devenir un peu trop compliqué :D Donc, nous somme en présence d'image d'un auteur probablement anonyme et français (votre arrière grand père n'est pas ce qu'on appelle l'auteur, il n'a pas appuyé "sur le bouton"), mais publiés pour la première fois aux pays bas probablement 70 après la mort de l'auteur. J'avoue qu'on est au delà des connaissances que j'ai pu accumuler sur le droit d'auteur. Le cas semble se rapprocher des archéologues qui obtiennent il me semble une exclusivité de 25 ans sur leurs découvertes... mais c'est flou pour moi ;) Évidemment la panacée serait de contacter un conseillé juridique spécialisé... mais je me fait pas d'illusions. La publication sur Commons peut s'avérer plus tard problématique, le statut juridique de ces image étant complexe, et je vous informe qu'un débat pour leur suppression peut avoir lieu (et il serait animé). J'espère ne pas vous avoir trop ennuyé avec cette discussion, et je crois que je n'ai pas encore eu l'occasion de vous dire que j'avais apprécie ces images d'époque du Maroc. Je ne peux vous fournir d'avantage d'informations, et espère au moins vous avoir fournit l'occasion de voir quel type d'informations nous recherchons sur Commons lors de la publication d'images. Cordialement, Lilyu (talk) 04:50, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Et oui, c'est compliqué! Et non, ce n'est pas toujours celui qui presse le bouton qui a la propriété intellectuelle (par exemple, le cameraman ,n'a PAS la propriété intellectuelle de l'émission qu'il enregistre pour la télévision). Et non, la première publication n'a pas eu lieu aux Pays Bas (sur les serveurs de Wikimedia), mais en France sur les serveurs français qui abritent mon site de généalogie familiale. Je sens que vous ne suivez pas! Un peu d'attention s'il vous plait! ;-) Le général Dalbiez serait étonné de cette conversation, le sujet principal de ces photos étant lui-même, Lyautey n'étant qu'un épiphénomène pour cet homme parfaitement égocentrique!

Cordialement

Dom

Lily, Je me suis reporté au texte du jugement mentionné sur l'entrée que vous avez ouverte: http://www.easydroit.fr/jurisprudence/Cour-de-Cassation-Chambre-civile-1-du-9-novembre-1993-91-16-286-Publie-au-bulletin/C48090/ Je lis: Attendu qu'il résulte de ces textes qu'après l'expiration du délai de 50 ou 70 années civiles suivant celle du décès de l'auteur, les propriétaires du support matériel de ses oeuvres posthumes sont investis des droits patrimoniaux prévus par le livre I du Code de la propriété intellectuelle (loi du 11 mars 1957), et qu'il leur appartient d'en effectuer la publication, à l'exclusion des détenteurs de simples copies établies et remises sans intention de transmettre le droit d'exploitation virtuellement attaché à la propriété des supports matériels originaux ; Le texte me semble assez clair, et aller dans mon sens.

Cordialement

Dom Ddalbiez (talk) 19:20, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

...

Initial message: « ... », posted by Lilyu (d · c).

File:Diti with Keiko.jpg

C'est une photo de toi quand t'étais jeune ?

C'est qui le type qui te sert dans ses bras ?--Lilyu (talk) 05:46, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Voui, voui, c'est moi quand j'étais jeune  !

Le type qui me serre dans ses bras ? Ben… cf. l'image de droite :p . →Diti the penguin — 00:42, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Just for your information

Just for your information,Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#File:Michael_P._Murphy.jpg Esby (talk) 03:42, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

UserPage

Jolie ;) Otourly (talk) 17:23, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Et utile, as a reminder :) . →Diti the penguin — 00:35, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Salebot.png

Hi Lilyu. Juste pour dire qu'il me semble, si tu places une image dans le domaine public, c'est un peu inutile de la placer également sous GFDL ou licence CC. Un peu comme placer une image sous double licence CC-BY et CC-BY-ND (CC-BY englobe les droit de CC-BY-ND et l'étend). Voilou, c'est tout. Cordialement. ~ bayo or talk 15:03, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Re, pardon, j'avais pas bien lu ta réponse. En fait WTF Public License est équivalent au domaine public. ~ bayo or talk 14:15, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

map

hello : i have redraw your map File:ACW Chattanooga2Carolinas.png into SVG File:ACW Chattanooga2Carolinas-fr.svg (and translate it into french by the way)... but i was wondering why there was 2 BLUE lines from Savannah to Raleigh : shouldn't one of them be red as i think it might be Johnston Hood's army ? i dunno...

And... a huge thanks for your great free work ! --Lilyu (talk) 08:52, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Hi. (I am surprised to see that there is a different spelling for Mississippi in French!) The map doesn't show any Confederate movements against Sherman after November 1864 because there weren't many large movements to speak of. The Union Army proceeded in two separated columns, which is why there are two arrows. Je vous en prie. :-) Hlj (talk) 13:30, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Nom du fichier File:Fairytale bookmark silverstar.svg

Pourquoi utiliser "fairytale" dans le nom de ce fichier ? Pour peu que ce soit une marque déposée, il y a un risque de problèmes. Teofilo (talk) 11:42, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Je n'ai rien vérifié, donc peut-être que les gens à l'origine de ce nom sont des gens hyper cool à des années lumières de la mentalité "propriété intellectuelle". Teofilo (talk) 12:59, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

coucou

dits, j'ai vue la PàS sur l'image de Coluche, je voudrais en savoir plus sur le lien google que tu as utilisé : c'est un identificateur de similitudes ?! si ça arrive à relier un dessin et une photo, ça a l'air plutôt puissant, comment ça s'utilise stp ? --Lilyu (talk) 17:43, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Salut, en fait c'est un outil en développement chez Google (Google Lab), pour le moment c'est seulement possible de faire d'abord un recherche d'image puis ensuite chercher les images smilaires via le lien dédié sous chaque image. C'est sûr qu'il serait très intéressant de trouver comment faire pareil avec un image dont on a l'url vu que il parait bien plus puissant que Tineye. Kyro (talk) 20:01, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

hop!

User:Esby/lilyu

Esby (talk) 11:40, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

ça m'a bien fait rigoler :D --Lilyu (talk) 09:05, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Live feeding

Hello, This is a simple deduction: there is no originality, therefore no copyright. It is the same for any automatic video system, like video monitoring. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:41, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Your thread of "disrupting contribution" won't end up anywhere. Two contributors (even 3, if I count MGA73) supported my view. Your opinion isn't any more guess work than any others. There is ample evidence that a live feed doesn't create any new original work. And finally, in matter of copyright, you have to remember that the proof is on the prosecutor. Your insistance for deletion in this case disrupts the project, and brings unnecessary conflict. Yann (talk) 12:09, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

I had some more thoughts about this case. Actually there are three reasons why there is no copyright here. For the existence of copyright, there needs (at least) three things: originality, fixation (it needs to be recorded in some permanent form), and author. As I said above, there is no originality in a live feed, it is automatic, there is no fixation, no recording, and last, there is no author. The set up of the camera can be done by any minded people, but it doesn't entitle anyone to a copyright. I added this to the DR for the record. Yann (talk) 19:08, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

I think you have mixed up several things in this issue: the copyright of the photographer is independent from the would-be copyright of a cameraman. Yann (talk) 09:40, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

hop!

Attaque de tortues!

Esby (talk) 15:45, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Mona

Toi tu dois avoir un sourire à la Mona Lisa à certains moments ! :) Merci Lilyu pour ta correction. Ce n'est que la deuxième fois que je place un fichier modifié et je ne connaissais pas la procédure qui consiste à mettre "fichier retouché" (note que pour la première fois, ça a raté aussi : j'avais passé longtemps à refaire un coupe de champignons en français alors qu'elle était en polonais et vlan ! supprimé ! car l'image originale n'avait pas le droit d'être sur Commons... :( Enfin, ici ça restera. Merci encore, l'ignare --Égoïté (talk) 18:24, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Atmosphère, atmosphère...

Salut,

C'est moi qui avait harmonisé les différents "atmosphere layers-*", il est probable que j'ai fait un copier/coller depuis une des versions, en propageant cette erreur... Quoiqu'il en soit, c'est corrigé. Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 13:01, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Version française de "Termination Shock"

Et voici la version original en format GIMP: http://ticpu.net:8080/~jerome/Termination_shock_fr.xcf
TiCPU (talk) 16:45, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

File:Coumaroyl-Coenzyme A.svg

Hi Lilyu. The structure you uploaded is not entirely correct (compare e.g. this). One double bond is missing and it lacks the stereochemical information. Can you please fix that? --Leyo 07:39, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Pour ta question de tout à l'heure sur irc, ce bandeau commons pourra répondre à tes inquiétudes, je pense Rhadamante (talk) 16:40, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

MERCI !!! --Lilyu (talk) 23:07, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

File:Pala a Samoan girl 1896.jpg

Thank you Lily. I'm correcting the other photos I previously uploaded.

Would you mind checking if this one is ok, please? Before I upload more photos from this book. many thanks Teinesavaii (talk) 05:04, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

wow, talofa! you're the first Polynesian wikipedian i've touch base with. I'm from Savai'i. Teinesavaii (talk) 05:06, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Deux petits trucs...

• http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category_talk:Images_by_Lilyu&oldid=32945704

• je peux te passer une commande ? je voudrais un dessin de 'chibi'-lilyu dans la scene de michel-ange, File:Creation_of_Adam.jpg (en remplacant Adam par une lilyu sur sa tortue par exemple.)

Esby (talk) 22:16, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

non--Lilyu (talk) 04:48, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Please help replace this outdated license

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

• File:John Brown Gordon.gif

BotMultichillT 20:47, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

i know, i know. It's from 19th century, it's on congress library where it was labeled "no copyright known" when i saw it. I thinkt hey have changed the page from when i have read it when i uploaded it. It's at least {{PD-US}} (US work released before 1 january 1923). But i'm not sure what template licence would be the most correct. --Lilyu (talk) 16:21, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Je sais que je ferais bien de m'abstreindir

Mais lit quand même le commentaire de [5], puis va respirer l'air frais tant qu'il est encore gratuit. --GaAs¹¹⁶⁷¹ 20:23, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

[Category:Emote template] a été renommée en Category:Emoticon templates

Maintenant faut compléter tous les liens rouges. Amitiés. --GaAs¹¹⁶⁷¹ 21:41, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Modèles d'émoticones

Salut Lilyu (j'adore tes dessins, mais c'est hors sujet). J'ai ouvert une discussion

• ici en anglais : COM:VP#Templates for smilies (an unimportant subject)
• ici en français : COM:BI#Modèles d'émoticones (sujet pas vraiment important)

--GaAs¹¹⁶⁷¹ 16:18, 12 April 2010 (UTC) PS : j'aime ton bandeau rouge en haut de cette page, mais je n'aime pas le fait que tu sembles avoir abandonné wp (je sais pourquoi).

gPotato screenshot

chère Lilyu. Just curious why you put the gPotato screenshot draft page image I am working on as up for speedy deletion? http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mtstaffa&diff=0&oldid=56011397

I am in charge of branding at Gala Inc. (based in Tokyo Japan) and I uploaded the screenshot from the portal site (gpotato.com) of the subsidiary my company owns (Gala-Net Inc.) We would like to have a similar game portal page layout as Hangame http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hangame Hangame. So, can you remove the speedy deletion for the two gPotato screenshots please? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mtstaffa (talk • contribs)

unnecessary warning

The warning that you placed on my page of discussion of Wikimedia Commons was innesesaria and wrong, because I did send a permission message to the Wikimedia Commons in which I indicated the permission that the original author of the picture gave me for upload the photo to Wikipedia.

I had previously upload the same photo to wikimedia, but in this case I had not sent the message permission to climb it to wikimedia commons and the photo was removed. This time the situation is very different. Please, remove the template warning about the removal of the photo for "not have" permission to upload the same. In fact, after reading your warning I sent a second message on the author's permission if the first had arrived. Thank you. --Isinbill (talk) 15:16, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks to remove the template of Pelinor.--Isinbill (talk) 12:38, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

I was referring to the template to mark the file for fast deleted. Without wanting I put "please" when I wanted to say thanks. But I corrected the error.--Isinbill (talk) 16:27, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

I wonder if there is a problem for that the permissions to upload photos to Wikimedia OTRS permission are receive for they. I think there must be some problem.

Makedonski Golos

Hi. I usually use Makedonski Golos as publisher of the pictures, not me. Best,--MacedonianBoy (talk) 11:15, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Ups, sorry, I forgot to change my name in the template. Best,--MacedonianBoy (talk) 11:15, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Gino Loria

Hi. I don't know anything about this picture [6] and I couldn't find any information on internet. How can I proceed. Many thanks. Matteo Carcassi (talk) 07:07, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

File:BU West sign.JPG deletion discussion

Ben.mq mentioned that you'd discussed File:BU West sign.JPG with him on IRC, and that you believe it meets threshold of originality. I don't, hence why I decided to upload it and a cropped version. I won't be able to actively join the discussion till later (just got back from vacation), but if you're willing to comment on the discussion here that would be awesomely cool. Thanks! Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:23, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

OTRS

Permission was sent a few minutes after uploading. Let me know if it's in the queue. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:23, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

No worries. I guess that template was hidden well at the bottom. That image is definitely a prime candidate for flagging, it looks like it was pulled from a Google search. But I did receive permission for it, so hopefully it's processed quickly. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:35, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Heather Moore photo

File:HeatherMooreByPhilKonstantin.JPG : I have flag it duplicate. Is this what you meant by "Redirect" ?

You're really the original author of this photo ? Lilyu (talk) 14:06, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Yes, I am, along with hundreds of other I took while I worked at KUSI TV. Http://americanindian.net/kusi.html. I tried to update the photo three days after I originally submitted it. For some reason, it still listed both photos.

Duplicate?

Hello Lilyu,

your subpage User:Lilyu/Editbar2.js shows up in Category:Duplicate. Any idea why? Regards --Rosenzweig δ 17:03, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

It's also in Category:Copyright violations - probably in more? --Rosenzweig δ 17:22, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

i got it, it's probably because it applies the template while it should be in javascript code. gimme a sec to solve this :) --Lilyu (talk) 18:03, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

It should be solved by now, i added \{\{template}} rather than {{template}} in the javascript code (shortcut buttons i created for my toolbar)

Thank you for warning me Lilyu (talk) 18:14, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

You're welcome. It seems you succeeded, the page is not listed in the categories any longer. Regards --Rosenzweig δ 18:41, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

ça maaaaaarche !!! \o/ --Lilyu (talk) 03:27, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Hint :-| -- πϵρήλιο ℗ 10:46, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Château de Trencsén.jpg

Bonjour,

J'ai lu ton message. J'ai effectivement uploadé quelques images depuis flickr, mais si tu me dis que la licence n'est pas correcte, peux-tu me dire comment la modifier ? Quant au nom de l'auteur, s'il est inconnu... je ne vois pas trop quoi faire. Cdlt --FreCha (talk) 02:51, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Merci pour ta réponse,je ne suis pas très familier avec commons, et je vais corriger la license. S'agissant de l'auteur, ça n'est pas rare de ne pas le connaître quand il s'agit de lithographies ou gravures illustrant des ouvrages, comme ici. Un grand nombre d'entre elles portent la mention unknown sur commons. De plus il s'agit d'une source universitaire, je pense qu'on peut leur faire confiance s'il dise que l'auteur est inconnu.

Je t'embête encore un peu, juste pour être sûr de bien comprendre. J'ai uploadé une image File:L'Art et la Littérature.jpg, quelqu'un est passé pour mettre la license PD-Art, puis un bot à ajouté cc-by-2.0. Je dois donc supprimer la license du bot ? J'ai bien compris ? --FreCha (talk) 03:25, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

{{Wrong license}}

• scope of this template more clear  Done
• should be substed and with dated categories

https://addons.mozilla.org/de/firefox/addon/firebug/ --Lilyu (talk) 07:03, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Not sure if it really needs to be substed - but we should think about it at least. Let's discuss this in chat at some point in future. ;) Poooony! --Saibo (Δ) 16:21, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Petralona.jpg

Good morning. You have left a message for user Kalogeropoulos of the Greek Wikipedia about a photo (skull at Petralona). The user is currently unavailable, so please be a little patient. He usually uploads his own photos and when he 'll be back I'm positive he will be able to complete the missing fields for this photo. Thank you. --Ttzavaras (talk) 08:51, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Sadly

This user has edited their page but not responded. I am sure some images are not "moi" as the author but - if you have any suggestions at all? Merci, amicalement --Herby ^{talk thyme} 09:51, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

As to not being an admin you have quite a few more edits than many have (and more than I had when I started with the tools...:)).

Anyway - I've deleted the Russian contribs thanks , I see he is blocked there so it seems possible he will not get the message but we will see.

On the French user it is a pity they are not responding (I see they have the same page on fr wp - I think it was deleted once but maybe not). Given their apparent record shooting they might justify a wikipedia page I guess but it does seem that they are using the project for their own benefit not ours which is the issue for me. I will delete the obvious copyvio and maybe give it a day or two and see if they respond then. My thanks for the assistance - merci & amicalement --Herby ^{talk thyme} 12:18, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Hum - not actually blocked on fr wp yet I see (though warned twice). If they do not respond within 48 hours I think I will delete the page (per fr wp). I may ask you to post something after that maybe. Merci encore :) --Herby ^{talk thyme} 12:53, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

I deleted the page and there does not seem to have been a response which is sad. My thanks for your help in this anyway and your other work on Commons. Regards --Herby ^{talk thyme} 18:18, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Des images

Merci pour me remarquer sur les images, j'ai commencé qu'il fait peu et ai à beaucoup apprendre encore sur les copyrights, regrette de t'avoir fait perdre le temps :(

PD : s'il y a quelque chose que tu n'entends pas, disculpe-moi, puisque j'utilise un traducteur.

Un salut

--Codepage (talk) 16:04, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

WTFPL

Hi. Please wait, I'm working on it :)--Trixt (talk) 10:22, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Ok, now should be all OK :) However, perhaps a couple of hours is needed to refresh the cache.--Trixt (talk) 10:30, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for your reply, I guess I think this should be a little more User Friendly to be of help to anyone! I try to follow the long drawn out process, but it just leads to more long drawn out processes and I don't have a lot of time to even get frustrated with that. I first thought about the filenames, but since there was no requirement stated, I just used the meaningless ones cause it's quicker. When I get a chance, I'll go back and redo it all and try again to get my photos from Flicker to my account here. But there's also the fact that the Gallery doesn't work, so other services don't have that problem and people can automatically go to your Gallery and see your Pictures. I guess that's really not the main focus here, but it doesn't hurt to have the things functioning that work for other sites doing the same Media! Thanks again for your help!

Aide moi svp?

If you are available could you assist here. The user has reuploaded previously un watermarked images with a watermark that says "all rights reserved". I guess it is likely they are the photographer but they will need to confirm that and removed the watermark. Merci beaucoup, amicalement --Herby ^{talk thyme} 12:44, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

there are two accounts : Rainbow0413 (talk · contribs) and Vanille0413 (talk · contribs)... Probably the same person, it's a real mess. I highly disagree with speedy tagging those images and get them deleted without any talk, like it was done on File:Chapelle Notre Dame de la Roque - Villeneuve (04).JPG. There is nothing obvious here.

Removed the watermark ? i'm sorry, but can't you just revert the upload of the watermarked version... why reuploading ?

I think those images should not be speedydelete but rather put into a mass DR, as it is not an obvious case.

What i understand from copyright laws is that the "all rights reserved" sentence has no longer any legal meaning, and i doubt it ever had one in France. "Copyright @blablabla All right reserved" is a claim of copyright holding, but it DO NOT means the work was not published with licenses etc, it's just a claim that someones hold copyright rights over a work of art. When publishing a a work with a free license, the author/copyright holder keep his rights... he just ALSO share some of his rights to other peoples, while still keeping his rights and the right to use them... unless an exclusivity clause was part of the contract.

This user also asked his photos to be deleted and his account closed. My opinion is that both of this actions cannot be done by a commons' admin. GFDL and CC BY SA licenses used by this user are irrevocable, although the french law allows a french author to retract from publishing,

Art. L. 121-4 : Nonobstant la cession de son droit d'exploitation, l'auteur, même postérieurement à la publication de son oeuvre, jouit d'un droit de repentir ou de retrait vis-à-vis du cessionnaire. Il ne peut toutefois exercer ce droit qu'à charge d'indemniser préalablement le cessionnaire du préjudice que ce repentir ou ce retrait peut lui causer. Lorsque, postérieurement à l'exercice de son droit de repentir ou de retrait, l'auteur décide de faire publier son oeuvre, il est tenu d'offrir par priorité ses droits d'exploitation au cessionnaire qu'il avait originairement choisi et aux conditions originairement déterminées.

"Notwithstanding the transfer of his right of exploitation, the author, even after the publication of his work, has a right to repent (reconsider) or retract regarding the assignee. However, he can exercise this right only if he take the charge to indemnify the assignee beforehand for any prejudice the reconsideration or withdrawal may cause to him. When, after the exercise of his right to reconsider or withdraw, the author decides to publish his work, he must offer in priority his exploitation rights to the assignee he originally chose and with the conditions originally determined."

I would probably inform this user that he can only get his account renamed, but not deleted, due to technical problems, and that if he wants to retract from publishing, he has to directly get in contact with the WMF and offer them proper indemnification, the WMF would than chose to remove the content from its website OR chose to fight his decision (with FSF and Creative Commons) to get a law case concerning the free licensing... probably on US copyright ground.

I'm not a lawyer, this is just my uninformed opinion, please contact a lawyer to get legal informations. --Lilyu (talk) 14:10, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Thoughts appreciated (again!).

I agree - freely licensed is just that and we cannot delete his account (he has a previous one too if you look at the images). He could start a DR asking to have them deleted - it has worked out sometimes when people do that.

Could you post something on his page explaining the situation when you have the time? Merci encore :) --Herby ^{talk thyme} 14:44, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

i posted to his talk page what you previously asked : "confirmation that there's a single person behind the two account, that he's author, and to contact OTRS".

I also a added a little message to User talk:Túrelio who i saw deleting one of the images.

I think you should remove your copyvio tags, try to start a talk with the user (i would be glad to translate), and either open a mass DR in a few days, or choose to tell him to see directly with WMF.--Lilyu (talk) 14:53, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Sorry too late - they have gone - I will be happy to undelete them though if we can get some clarifications? --Herby ^{talk thyme} 15:17, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Catching up with things quickly but very useful work and many thanks. Hopefully we can get a good outcome to this. Will look more later, amicalement --Herby ^{talk thyme} 08:35, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

yeah, i translated in english for you to check the conversation (or the admins when i'll ask to undelete). I'm waiting for a last reply from this user, but i think we will be able to end it in a good way for everyone.--Lilyu (talk) 08:37, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

I've undeleted them (I'm sure Turelio will not mind) as I was probably too hasty tagging them in the first place - please apologise to the user for me (although it was with the intention of protecting their copyright. It would be good to lose the watermark too as it will save others doing as I did if you can ask?

Again many thanks for your help - you are an asset to Commons. It might be useful one day if you felt like using additional tools here ;) Amicalement --Herby ^{talk thyme} 11:16, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

I warned the user the images were restored. Did you check there's only 2 images still deleted (2 accounts)? Would they be useful for an encyclopedia, did you checked they are not used somewhere on the web (googleimage/tinyeye), and do you think it would worth annoy this user to get the 2 last ones restored ?

I didn't apologize for you to this user, there's really no reason to do so Don't worry.--Lilyu (talk) 11:30, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Good point - two more undeleted :) --Herby ^{talk thyme} 11:51, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

You are going too quick, i thought you had read the talk page of this user and saw that we agreed on restoring 3 images and keep 2 of them deleted, as i also explained on Turelio's talk page. My question was to check if there was not MORE than 5 files concerned. Also, i can see now that the 2 last photos that the author would like to keep deleted are used on many different wikipedias. Do you think we should try to convince to keep those two online ? Or do you re-delete them to comply to his request ?

*sigh* Don't be so fast. I translated, read. It's 2 am here, and i thought this was finally finish and i could go to sleep...--Lilyu (talk) 12:05, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Apologies - sleep now - things will not change until your morning (I assumed you were in fr). It would be good to keep all the images I think. Dormez bien :) --Herby ^{talk thyme} 12:08, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

He said that now that it is done, we can keep them as it is.--Lilyu (talk) 21:57, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Des permissions Copyright

Salut, Lylu sur les images du F-15 Silent Eagle repoussés, pour enfreindre le copyright, dans celles-ci Boeing met "Approved for public relase" en bas au centre : est-ce que cela raconterait comme permission de l'auteur?

Une question ¿Les images qu'ils n'incluent pas dans son information copyright peuvent-elles monter ?

¡Ha!, de je m'oubliais, ma langue est l'Espagnol de l'Espagne (es-es) --Codepage (talk) 07:41, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

About "File:Ramanujacharya.jpg" source information.

This file [7] was uploaded by me, a few weeks back. The individual portrayed in the picture is a saintly figure, who is an icon of worship, for my group of people. While placing orders to print my marriage invitation, I had requested the "marriage card printers" to include an image of "Ramanuja(a godly figure) seen with vadakalai tilak markings", in the back page of the invitation(it is a custom amongst us). Also, i had requested them for a copy of the same, burnt in a CD. I had personally given the description for the image, as to how it is supposed to be, and they designed it exclusively for "printing it in my marriage invitation". Henceforth i got it, and uploaded it here. The work is not found anywhere in the internet, and i had claimed it to be "my own work". It is indeed "own work". Also, it just a sketch/painting/animation image. What is wrong with it?? Please enlighten. Also the page was vandalised by some new user/ips who made some dubious claims and made, egregious edits to the file information. I had nothing to do with it. Hari7478 (talk) 14:48, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Suppression

Bonjour, suite à Commons:Deletion requests/File:Crew ncis 2009 09 06 thetvdb.jpg, l'image a été supprimée car provenant d'un site web republiant incorrectement sous licence libre une image promotionnelle appartenant à CBS. En conséquence, les images dérivées que vous avez créés à partir de celle-ci ont malheureusement dut être aussi supprimées :

• File:David McCallum - NCIS.jpg
• File:Mark Harmon - NCIS.jpg
• File:Michael Weatherly - NCIS.jpg
• File:Pauley Perrette - NCIS.jpg
• File:Rocky Carroll - NCIS.jpg
• File:Sean Murray - NCIS.jpg
• File:Brian Dietzen - NCIS.jpg
• File:Cote de Pablo - NCIS.jpg

--Lilyu (talk) 19:06, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Bonsoir Lilyu, merci de m'avoir prévenu de la suppression de ces fichiers dérivés, j'y réfléchirai à deux fois avant d'agir ! Cordialement • Frantogian ^{You talkin' to me?} • 21:53, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Lilyu_Custom_Button_WTF.png

File:Lilyu_Custom_Button_WTF.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

80.187.218.82 12:15, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Lilyu_Custom_Button_Desc.png

File:Lilyu_Custom_Button_Desc.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

80.187.218.82 12:16, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Lilyu_Custom_Button_Lisc.png

File:Lilyu_Custom_Button_Lisc.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

80.187.218.82 12:16, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Lilyu_Custom_Button.png

File:Lilyu_Custom_Button.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

80.187.218.82 12:16, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

your turtle

Dear Lilyu

I saw your turtle on commons and find it beautiful. Now I would like to use this turtle a little bit modified as a logo and on a homepage for a disaster folding house after catastrophies. Therefor it should be a little modified. Are you able and willing to do that and what do you take for it? We can phone on skype or you can contact me at Thanks in advance Gerhard

File:NDiaye01-cropped.jpg

File:NDiaye01-cropped.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 12:58, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

File:WTFPL.svg

File:WTFPL.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Keφr (keep talk here) 05:39, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Marre des wikiconnards.svg

—LX (talk, contribs) 18:41, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Sweet Frenchie Lilyu's user page

Hi Lilyu on your user page it says:

"I always keep the paternity of my work."

instead of paternity shouldn't it be something else like patent etc. ? also I really appreciate your images of the Seldinger Technique Merci beaucoup 182.185.19.245 15:13, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

I think she is probably referring to the french law: paternity is due to art works, in theory, the author cannot renounce to it.

Esby (talk) 20:56, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Represent the world

French language Vinsent Constantine (talk) 02:22, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Category:Xia_Dynasty_ceramics

Xia Dynasty ceramics has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Enyavar (talk) 10:28, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Bannière du projet entreprises-fr.gif

File:Bannière du projet entreprises-fr.gif has been marked for speedy deletion as promotional material. Wikimedia Commons doesn't allow advertisements. Use Google Ads, Facebook ads or find other forums/websites. If you continue to upload advertisements, you may have to face some strict administrative actions. Please act wisely! Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now ! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Gnomingstuff.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 00:15, 18 October 2023 (UTC)