User talk:Erpert

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Erpert!
Pay attention to copyright
File:Nica Noelle.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

High Contrast (talk) 09:50, 29 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • I'm confused as to how this file is a copyright violation; the source page clearly states that the photo has a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. Erpert (talk) 10:01, 29 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    • Where is it written exactly? Does this CC-licence to the image as well or just for the blogger's text? --High Contrast (talk) 10:05, 29 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
      • It is written at the very bottom of the page. Erpert (talk) 17:37, 29 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
        • Yes, I read it. But, does this CC-licence apply to images as well? Or is this licensing text only for the blogger's text? --High Contrast (talk) 20:37, 29 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
          • How would I be able to tell? Would it have to explicitly state it applies to images on the blog? I thought a license automatically pertained to everything featured on the site (unless otherwise attributed to a different source); if not, I apologize. Erpert (talk) 06:54, 30 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • How about this? (It's taken from her partner's official blog.) Erpert (talk) 23:38, 30 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    • OK. But this is a different photograph of her. Is there a "connection" between the file we are talking about and the one you are linking to? Do you have contact to the bloggers? If yes, can you ask them if this image is theirs? --High Contrast (talk) 23:44, 30 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
      • There is no connection between this photo and the previous one; this one I suggested because I couldn't find good proof of licensing for the previous one (and this is actually Noelle's former partner's blog, lol). Anyway, at the bottom of the front page, it has the license information listed for everything on the site. Erpert (talk) 23:56, 30 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
        • Yes, I agree with you that the homepage content is under this free CC licence. But I still have a problem with the fact that the image we are talking about appears on this site as well. And the page http://www.goodforher.com is more reliable concerning licencing questions than a blog. We must figure out if the blogger is the copyright holder (e.g. he took this photograph) of this image or if this image is only a "random web grab". Do you have contact to the blogger? --High Contrast (talk) 14:40, 31 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
          • It isn't just any blogger though; it's the official blog of the actress (maybe a better link would be this; it actually goes to the same place). As far as contacting her, I can always try emailing her. And as for the Good For Her link, I think you might still be talking about the original photo. Erpert (talk) 19:43, 31 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
            • Yes that's a good idea: ask her per Email if she is reachable for such requests. And yes, an "original" photo would be appreciated or if possible, a higher resoluted copy. --High Contrast (talk) 12:18, 1 November 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
              • No--what I mean is, when you mentioned the photo also being featured on the Good for Her site, you're still talking about the photo I uploaded here that got deleted. I'm not talking about that photo anymore; I'm talking about this photo. Erpert (talk) 15:05, 1 November 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
                • What is wrong with this photo? Do you mean I see there a copyvio again? Well, by now I could not find another version of this image on the web that could show that we have a copyvio-issue. --High Contrast (talk) 16:01, 4 November 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Carmen Carrera.jpg, has been reviewed by an administrator or reviewer and found available on Flickr under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. Unless the Flickr user changes the license to one that Wikimedia Commons accepts, the file will be speedily deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. Once the license on Flickr is changed, you may replace the {{Unfree Flickr file}} tag with {{Flickrreview}} so that an administrator or reviewer can review the image again.

Túrelio (talk) 11:00, 2 November 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Boy, some of these rules are confusing. But I'll keep looking. Erpert (talk) 17:34, 2 November 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Jiz-lee-feminist-porn-awards-2010.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Jiz-lee-feminist-porn-awards-2010.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:53, 22 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • I don't understand how this was a copyright violation; I clearly listed the proof of licensing (everything on WordPress.com is listed under that license, including photos). And it would have been nice had you left a message on my talk page notifying me of the pending deletion. Erpert (talk) 03:13, 29 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    • I'm sorry but no. Everything on WordPress.com is not under a free licence. Only de CMS (here WordPress) is under a free licence. The rest depends on the author, and here there is no indication that the content is free. Kyro (talk) 07:51, 29 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
      • What's CMS? Anyway, where in those links I posted did it say that the content wasn't free? Erpert (talk) 10:17, 29 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Janet Mason 2010.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Martin H. (talk) 23:28, 25 March 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Anne Burrell.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Martin H. (talk) 21:44, 23 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Vanilla DeVille Francesca Le AVN Awards 2010.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

KTo288 (talk) 23:01, 8 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Jenny Ingram, Duskie Estes, John Stewart; SOBEWFF Miami 2013.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Ww2censor (talk) 20:54, 19 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]