Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Feb-Mar 2014
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Inactive administrators as of February 13, 2014[edit]
Admin actions over the last six months can be checked using this tool.
These users will be notified via talk page and email.
- All users have been notified via talk page and e-mail messages by odder (talk) 21:00, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment CommonsDelinkerHelper & KrinkleBot (both 0 admin actions) are exempted for being a bot account.
Inactive since last run[edit]
- Ala z (talk · contributions · Move log · Statistics · logs · block log)
- 0 actions since last run.
- Kved (talk · contributions · Move log · Statistics · logs · block log)
- 0 actions since last run.
- Luxo (talk · contributions · Move log · Statistics · logs · block log)
- 3 actions since last run.
- Philosopher (talk · contributions · Move log · Statistics · logs · block log)
- 2 actions since last run.
- Zyephyrus (talk · contributions · Move log · Statistics · logs · block log)
- 4 actions since last run.
Rights removed by M7 --Steinsplitter (talk) 21:04, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
- + Greudin (see talk page) (removed) --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:48, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Admin responses[edit]
Admins who have been queried about their adminship, please sign below and also fill in the table above. If you don't sign by 15 March 2014, 23:59:59 UTC, you will lose adminship automatically.
Confirm your adminship here[edit]
- Signed & acknowledged! Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 20:54, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
- Walter Siegmund (talk) 21:01, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
- I breathe, therefore I live (or something) Siebrand 21:02, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
- JDavid (talk) 21:49, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thuresson (talk) 22:10, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
- Dantadd signed here. odder (talk) 08:58, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
- ALE! ¿…? 12:51, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
- /á(!) 13:43, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
- Jcornelius (talk) 13:44, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
- JGHowes talk - 18:44, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
- Kyro (talk) 12:28, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
- Magnus Manske (talk) 10:18, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
- Like the others above I conform that I will make at least a million admin actions or give a round of beer to everyone ;-) Well or at least that I plan to some work --MGA73 (talk) 15:10, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
- --Elitre (talk) 16:24, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
- Krzysiu (talk) 18:50, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- notafish }<';> 11:14, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- I'm totally coming back. Soon! –moogsi (talk) 19:31, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- Info Wvk (talk · contribs) performed 50+ deletions since the start of the run, even though they did not sign here. odder (talk) 11:54, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- I would consider that is a clear indication of willingness to continue serving as an administrator, which effectively is equivalent to signing here. whym (talk) 12:23, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- See m:Steward requests/Permissions#Wvk.40commonswiki --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:35, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- The link won't work, as I reverted the request. Wvk is active, even if they didn't sign here. odder (talk) 12:41, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- I don't see the signature... Per policy we need to remov his flag. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:43, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- No. odder (talk) 12:45, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Please discuss it over here and come to a conclusion, don't edit war in steward requests page. Thank you--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 12:53, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- No. odder (talk) 12:45, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- I don't see the signature... Per policy we need to remov his flag. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:43, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- The link won't work, as I reverted the request. Wvk is active, even if they didn't sign here. odder (talk) 12:41, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- See m:Steward requests/Permissions#Wvk.40commonswiki --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:35, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- I have to agree with Steinsplitter here. The policy is clear: Wvk had to sign and perform > 5 admin actions after start of the run. He didn't sign what means he didn't met the policy and thus should his sysop bit be removed. JurgenNL (talk) 13:07, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- He has been active enough. Are wel really that bureaucratic that we are removing the tools over a missing autograph? Come on. Natuur12 (talk) 13:16, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Stop being petty people, the user makes good actions and you are worried about coming here and adding a signature. We need good admins and here you are shooting them over not fawning over your piece of bureaucracy. Be bold and understand the principle of the policy. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:38, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Stop ignoring Commons Policy. Also Bureaucrats and Steward must respect the policy. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:53, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Stop being petty people, the user makes good actions and you are worried about coming here and adding a signature. We need good admins and here you are shooting them over not fawning over your piece of bureaucracy. Be bold and understand the principle of the policy. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:38, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- He has been active enough. Are wel really that bureaucratic that we are removing the tools over a missing autograph? Come on. Natuur12 (talk) 13:16, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- I would consider that is a clear indication of willingness to continue serving as an administrator, which effectively is equivalent to signing here. whym (talk) 12:23, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- I would like to contribute as admin. --Wvk (talk) 16:41, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you, Wvk. You can stay one if it was up to me. The above signature and the note here confirms to me that he just wishes to continue to help us. Can we now stop with this discussion and just go on with contributing to Commons? And yes, Steinsplitter, it's ridiculous to start an RFC just because someone was a bit late with signing; especially when there are signs that he signed here the first day of the inactivity round. Rules are important but we don't need to be bureaucratic all the time. We're all human beings and you just need to assume a bit AGF from you colleagues from time to time. Thank you. In any case, I will certainly fully oppose the RFC you announced. Trijnsteltalk 16:50, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
To resign your adminship, sign here[edit]
- Bencmq (talk) 05:31, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
- Mentifisto changed user rights for Bencmq@commonswiki from OTRS-member, sysop to OTRS-member. --Alan (talk) 13:37, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
- AVRS (talk) 10:58, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- Mentifisto changed group membership for User:AVRS@commonswiki from administrator to none. odder (talk) 11:52, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Result[edit]
Resigned[edit]
- Bencmq (talk · contribs) Rights removed on February 27. odder (talk) 12:55, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- AVRS (talk · contribs) Rights removed on March 9. odder (talk) 12:55, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Failed to sign[edit]
- Chatama (talk · contribs) Rights removed by Shanmugamp7. odder (talk) 12:55, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Foroa (talk · contribs) Rights removed by Shanmugamp7. odder (talk) 12:55, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Rd232 (talk · contribs) Rights removed by Shanmugamp7. odder (talk) 12:55, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Steven Walling (talk · contribs) Rights removed by Shanmugamp7. odder (talk) 12:55, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Failed to sign, but performed > 5 admin actions since the start of the run[edit]
- Wvk (talk · contribs) (see log)
- Note Wvk performed 50+ log actions between February 14 and March 10, but did not sign on this page. By the letter of the rules, they should have their admin privileges revoked, but I believe that their activity is more than enough of a sign they want to retain their rights. odder (talk) 12:55, 17 March 2014 (UTC)